Skip to main content
· 2/7/1896

Pollock v. Horn

Citations

  • 13 Wash. 626
  • 43 P. 885
  • 1896 Wash. LEXIS 102

Syllabus

<p>INSANITY—LIABILITY OF INSANE SUEETY — JUDGMENT •— COLLATERAL ATTACK.</p> <p>A judgment against an insane surety upon a forthcoming bond in attachment proceedings is not void, if the surety was not insane at the time the bond was given.</p> <p>Questions as to irregularities in the proceedings in which a judgment is rendered against an insane person cannot be raised in a collateral attack.</p> <p>The fact that the insanity of a judgment debtor had been established prior to the rendition of judgment against him, would not exempt his property from the operation of an execution flowing from a legal judgment, which had not been fraudulently or wrongfully obtained.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.