California Court of Appeal· 1/5/1959
Pollard v. Pollard
Citations
- 166 Cal. App. 2d 698
- 333 P.2d 356
- 1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 2536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- total lack of cross-examination caused by party producing the deponent; deposition excluded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Draper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowen v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 288×
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1985-04-16· cited 110×
- Marcotte v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1982-04-02· cited 49×
- George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1984-04-30· cited 26×
- Visini v. VisiniCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-01-22· cited 9×
- DuBois v. LarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-12-03· cited 3×
- Smith v. the James Irvine FoundationC.D. California· 1967-12-18· cited 3×
- Vercelli v. VercelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-04-15
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dinneen v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-02-19· cited 28×
- Scott v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1892-06-07· cited 11×
- Jud Whitehead Heater Co. v. OblerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-06-23· cited 10×
- Keating v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1944-10-05· cited 9×
- Azevedo v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-10-20· cited 9×
- Callegari v. MaurerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-01-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.