Pollard v. HANSCHEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the distinction between a no-evidence motion for summary judgment and a traditional motion for summary judgment that requires the moving party to come forward with evidence to support the elements of its claim or defense
• “A claim for money had and received is equitable in nature and belongs conceptually to the doctrine of unjust enrichment. As such, the two-year statute of limitations applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).