Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff's failure to rebut the employer's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her termination was not relevant to a hostile work environment claim
• concluding that the plaintiff’s failure to rebut the employer’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her termination was not relevant to a hostile work environment claim
• holding that the 1991 amendments did not alter nature of front pay as equitable remedy provided for in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)
• noting that remedies available under Title VII are backpay, frontpay, reinstatement, compensatory and punitive damages
• noting that courts have ordered front pay as a substitute for reinstatement where reinstatement is not viable
• noting that remedies available under Title VII are backpay, frontpay, reinstatement, compensatory and punitive damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).