Pollard v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the language of the statute clearly “requires ... proof of a causal connection between the driver’s intoxication and the death of another person”
• holding that the language of the statute clearly \requires... proof of a causal connection between the driver's intoxication and the death of another person\
• \The evidence ... was sufficient to prove that [defendant's] intoxication caused him to operate his vehicle in a manner that resulted in [the victim's] death.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Gomez-Leon
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-09-24· cited 95×
• Goodman v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-01-29· cited 24×
• Hall v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-06-20· cited 22×
• Castillo v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-12-29· cited 21×
• Eddie Wayne Stover v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-12-28· cited 8×
• United States v. Gomez-Leon
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-09-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Essex v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1984-10-12· cited 189×
• Hubbard v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1992-01-10· cited 89×
• Keech v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-12-12· cited 44×
• Delawder v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1973-06-11· cited 42×
• Beck v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-06-13· cited 42×
• Mayo v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1977-11-23· cited 36×