Pollack v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that usual presumptive bar on interlocutory appeals applies to appeals from decisions of Appellate Division
• \reject[ing] as premature\ appeal from Appellate Division of interlocutory order and noting that party's report of interlocutory order to Appellate Division \was also premature\
• reminding litigants that G. L. c. 231, §§ 6E-6G, provides a basis for sanctions for “continued use of . . . delaying tactics in the face of settled law against the presentation of interlocutory appeals”
• reminding litigants that G. L. c. 231, §§ 6E-6G, provide a basis for sanctions for “continued use of . . . delaying tactics in the face of settled law against the presentation of interlocutory appeals”
• standard can be met after party’s “continued use of . . . delaying tactics in the face of settled law”
• interlocutory review of District Court order, double costs awarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).