Nevada Supreme Court· 6/3/2010

Polk v. State

Citations

233 P.3d 357
126 Nev. 180
126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 19
2010 Nev. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a party is obligated \to provide legal authority and analysis\ or risk forfeiting review by this court
noting that this court may deem a failure to respond to be a concession
noting that this court may deem a failure to respond to be a concession
noting any error will be harmless if the State can show beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict
explaining a Crawford violation will be harmless if the State can show beyond a reasonable doubt the error did not contribute to the verdict
relying on the Supreme Court opinions in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and Melendez-Diaz

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Douglas, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.