Polk v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State was not required to allege an accomplice theory in defendant’s indictment in order to proceed with the theory at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mooney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-07-01· cited 3×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-05-05· cited 2×
• Phengthavy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-12-11· cited 1×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-12-16· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clem v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-11-21· cited 36×
• Fields v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-06· cited 20×
• Dunlap v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-09-17· cited 20×
• Lee v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-01-17· cited 13×
• Christian v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-06-26· cited 10×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-07-16· cited 8×