Polk v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
Citations
- 266 Pa. 335
- 109 A. 627
- 1920 Pa. LEXIS 566
Syllabus
<p>Workmen’s compensation — Railroads—Claim for compensation —Defense—Interstate commerce — Burden of proof — Presumption.</p> <p>Tbe burden of establishing tbe fact that an employee of a railroad company was, at the time of tbe occurrence of an injury from which be died, engaged in performing duties incident to interstate commerce, is upon tbe defendant who alleges that fact as a defense to a claim for compensation, inasmuch as there is no presumption as to tbe character of tbe employment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- effect of discontinuance of plaintiffs suit upon claim between defendants evoked by that suit is prescribed by Pa.R.C.P. 232(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.