Skip to main content
· 2/27/1934

Polk County Nat. Bank of Bartow v. Shelton

Citations

  • 69 F.2d 352
  • 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a petitioner would not be entitled to relief unless he at least “affirmatively prove[d] that he is probably innocent”
  • finding that the petitioner opened the actual innocence gateway where another person testified under oath that he committed the offense and separately boasted to other individuals that he set-up the petitioner
  • finding that the petitioner opened the actual innocence gateway where another person testified under oath that he committed the offense and separately boasted to other individuals that he set-up the petitioner
  • finding that the petitioner opened the actual innocence gateway where another person testified under oath that he committed the offense and separately boasted to other individuals that he set-up the petitioner
  • finding due process violation when prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory evidence relating to witness' history of untruthfulness and violent behavior
  • deciding en banc that a stand-alone substantive actual innocence claim, if cognizable, requires an \extraordinarily high\ showing, stronger than what is required to establish insufficiency of the evidence to convict and going beyond demonstrating doubt about guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutcheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.