Poliszczuk v. Winkler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding jury award of no damages for loss of normal life
• “fact that the jury chose to award no money for disability and for loss of normal life, while awarding money for medical expenses and pain and suffering, is not proof, by itself, that the jury ‘ignored’ that element”
• “fact that the jury chose to award no money for disability and for loss of normal life, while awarding money for medical expenses and pain and suffering, is not proof, by itself, that the jury ‘ignored’ that element”
• “Pursuant to Frye *** the trial court closely examines proposed opinion testimony from a scientific expert to determine whether it bears sufficient indicia of reliability before the testimony is submitted to the jury.” (citing Soto, 313 Ill. App. 3d at 146-47)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).