· 5/24/2000
Poling v. K. Hovnanian Enterprises
Citations
- 99 F. Supp. 2d 502
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7308
- 2000 WL 688485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing with prejudice a RICO claim where plaintiffs had failed to comply with the court’s orders and had previously amended their complaint
- dismissing, in its entirety, action by pro se plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts for the court to evaluate the existence of diversity jurisdiction
- denying pro se plaintiff leave to amend because “such an amendment would be futile”
- dismissing, in its entirety, action by pro se plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts for the court to evaluate the existence of diversity jurisdiction
- “It is the plaintiffs’ burden to adequately plead diversity jurisdiction [in a diversity case].” (citations omitted)
- “It is the plaintiffs’ burden to adequately plead diversity jurisdiction [in a diversity case].” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hochberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.