Skip to main content
· 5/24/2000

Poling v. K. Hovnanian Enterprises

Citations

  • 99 F. Supp. 2d 502
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7308
  • 2000 WL 688485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing with prejudice a RICO claim where plaintiffs had failed to comply with the court’s orders and had previously amended their complaint
  • dismissing, in its entirety, action by pro se plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts for the court to evaluate the existence of diversity jurisdiction
  • denying pro se plaintiff leave to amend because “such an amendment would be futile”
  • dismissing, in its entirety, action by pro se plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts for the court to evaluate the existence of diversity jurisdiction
  • “It is the plaintiffs’ burden to adequately plead diversity jurisdiction [in a diversity case].” (citations omitted)
  • “It is the plaintiffs’ burden to adequately plead diversity jurisdiction [in a diversity case].” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hochberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.