Police Jury v. Arleans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendants “did not file any motion attacking the sufficiency of Plaintiffs' pleadings under Rule 9(b). As such, the Court finds this 26 defense is no longer relevant, and shall therefore be stricken.”
• striking Rule 9 challenge from motion for summary judgment where the defendants timely raised the affirmative defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).