Policano v. Herbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n a challenge to a state the evidence, though petitioner fails to make criminal conviction brought under 28 U.S.C. any specific challenge. (Pet. 9.
• Fama v. Comm’r of Corr. Servs., 235 F.3d 804, 811 (2d Cir. 2000)
• “[W]e decide not whether the state court correctly interpreted the doctrine of federal law on which the claim is predicated, but rather whether the state court’s interpretation was unreasonable in light of the holdings of the United States Supreme Court at the time.”
• “[W]e decide not whether the state court correctly interpreted the doctrine of federal law on which the claim is predicated, but rather whether the state court’s interpretation was unreasonable in light of the holdings of the United States Supreme Court at the time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).