Polewsky v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that what “happens to the data subsequent to being taken from the computers is not encompassed- in the purview of the CFAA”
• “Dresser–Rand does not point to any restrictions on King's access that, for instance, would allow him to view files on his laptop but forbid him from deleting them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).