· 1/16/1925
Poleskey v. United States
Citations
- 4 F.2d 110
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2912
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Expert testimony is generally required \in regard to professional standards of performance\ but is not required if the claimed breach is within the common knowledge of a layman jury
- “Generally, in order to survive summary judgment in a claim of legal malpractice, the plaintiff must provide expert testimony in order to demonstrate the breach of an attorney’s standard of care.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alschuler, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.