Skip to main content
· 5/9/2006

Polasek v. Omura

Citations

  • 2006 MT 103
  • 136 P.3d 519
  • 332 Mont. 157
  • 2006 Mont. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the close scrutiny that applies to any infringement on a person's right to parent a child requires a clear and convincing standard
  • reasoning that the close scrutiny that applies to any infringement on a person's right to parent a child requires a clear and convincing standard
  • in context of grandparent visitation, if parent is unfit, no presumption arises and parent’s wishes are due no deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.