· 12/28/1962
Polaroid Corporation v. Casselman
Citations
- 213 F. Supp. 379
- 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing value of in-court testimony and reversing order that allowed remote real-time testimony by video in criminal trial
- discussing value of in-court testimony and reversing order that allowed remote real- 9Hunter Engineering is a released party whose fault could be included on the verdict form. See Iowa Code § 668.3(2)(b
- “weight is given not to inconsequential priority in filing time but to substantial commitment to the cause, usually pretrial involvement for many months, by the court first acquiring jurisdiction”
- “weight is given not to inconsequential priority in filing time but to substantial commitment to the cause, usually pre-trial involvement for many months, by the court first acquiring jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacMAHON
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.