Skip to main content
· 12/28/1962

Polaroid Corporation v. Casselman

Citations

  • 213 F. Supp. 379
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing value of in-court testimony and reversing order that allowed remote real-time testimony by video in criminal trial
  • discussing value of in-court testimony and reversing order that allowed remote real- 9Hunter Engineering is a released party whose fault could be included on the verdict form. See Iowa Code § 668.3(2)(b
  • “weight is given not to inconsequential priority in filing time but to substantial commitment to the cause, usually pretrial involvement for many months, by the court first acquiring jurisdiction”
  • “weight is given not to inconsequential priority in filing time but to substantial commitment to the cause, usually pre-trial involvement for many months, by the court first acquiring jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.