Skip to main content
· 7/21/2016

Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co.

Citations

  • 223 F. Supp. 3d 1026
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[S]peculation does not meet the evidential requirements which would allow [a party] to defeat a summary judgment [motion].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.