Poland v. Louisiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “traditional principles of law of the case counsel against the transferee court reevaluating the rulings of the transferor court, including its transfer order”
• recognizing as a interest of justice “the possibility of the existence of questions arising in the area of conflict of laws; [and] the advantage of having a local court determine questions of local law_”
• requiring transferor court to determine that transferee court has personal jurisdiction over parties before it may transfer
• setting out factors courts consider in “an individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• setting out factors courts consider in “an individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• setting out factors courts consider in “an individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).