Poland Spring Co. v. Century Holding Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not a principal under the SRA and rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that the provision of data reports was sufficient to make the defendant a principal as “the reports [the defendant] generated were incidental to the services it provided”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).