Skip to main content
· 8/3/1973

Polakoff v. Henderson

Citations

  • 370 F. Supp. 690
  • 71 Ohio Op. 2d 106
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a] prisoner does not acquire a new domicile in the place of [his] incarceration, but retains the domicile he had prior to incarceration”
  • noting that “[a] prisoner does not acquire a new domicile in the place of [his] incarceration, but retains the domicile he had prior to incarceration”
  • “A prisoner does not acquire a new domicile in the place of his imprisonment, but retains the domicile he had prior to incarceration.”
  • a prisoner is presumed to retain the domicile he had prior 13 “For Diversity purposes, citizenship means domicile.” Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396, 1399 (5th Cir. 1974

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard C. Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.