Polak v. Whitney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 41 that where alcohol was served at residence, duty did not end abruptly at the boundary line of the property over which owner exercised control
• holding 41 that where alcohol was served at residence, duty did not end abruptly at the boundary line of the property over which owner exercised control
• holding 4/29/2021 3:53 PM 41 that where alcohol was served at residence, duty did not end abruptly at the boundary line of the property over which owner exercised control
• no duty to warn that an automobile could collide with an automobile parked on the street near defendant's house
• no duty to warn that an automobile could collide with an automobile parked on the street near defendant’s house
• no duty to warn that an automobile could collide with another automobile parked on the street near the defendant’s house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).