Skip to main content
· 5/10/1994

Pokladnik v. State

Citations

  • 876 S.W.2d 525
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1437
  • 1994 WL 178897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that the affidavits “belonged” to SDHPT because the form upon which they were based was prescribed by statute
  • “In short, no government entity ever put its hands on these documents”
  • “In short, no government entity ever put its hands on these documents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Burnett, Chapman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.