· 5/10/1994
Pokladnik v. State
Citations
- 876 S.W.2d 525
- 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1437
- 1994 WL 178897
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the argument that the affidavits “belonged” to SDHPT because the form upon which they were based was prescribed by statute
- “In short, no government entity ever put its hands on these documents”
- “In short, no government entity ever put its hands on these documents”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Burnett, Chapman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.