District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 4/30/1985
Poire v. Kaplan
Citations
- 491 A.2d 529
- 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting challenge to arbitration award in dispute arising out of joint venture agreement to purchase apartment and parking space; citing principle that ambiguity as to whether a matter is within arbitrator’s authority “must be resolved in favor of arbitration”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Belson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-13· cited 164×
- Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-10-20· cited 122×
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
- Benefits Communication Corp. v. KlieforthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-09· cited 56×
- Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-29· cited 47×
- Haynes v. KuderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-31· cited 42×
- Grad v. Wetherholt GalleriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-06-26· cited 24×
- Lopata v. CoyneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-08-05· cited 21×
- Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-08-31· cited 16×
- Shaff v. SkahillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-11· cited 15×
- Fraternal Order of Police/Department of Corrections Labor Committee v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-06-11· cited 12×
- American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3721 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-08· cited 11×
- Tauber v. Trammell Crow Real Estate Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-10-14· cited 11×
- Shore v. Groom Law GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-14· cited 10×
- Fairman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-25· cited 9×
- Motor City Drive, L.L.C. v. Brennan Beer Gorman Monk Architects & Interiors, P.L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-12· cited 7×
- Amatangelo v. SchultzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-10· cited 4×
- State v. Nebraska Assn. of Pub. EmployeesNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-01-20· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 5,791×
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 4,461×
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 289×
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-11-10· cited 201×
- Winthrop F. Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Limited and B. Francis SaulD.C. Circuit· 1981-10-15· cited 116×
- Baldwin v. MillsSupreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 98×
- Brandon v. HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-12-21· cited 46×
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. Overseas Private Investment CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1980-06-02· cited 42×
- Lutz v. LinthicumSupreme Court· 1834-03-11· cited 40×
- Coleman v. Lee Washington Hauling Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-02· cited 31×
- Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1970-07-15· cited 30×
- Sindler v. BatlemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-06-03· cited 21×
- Ballard & Associates, Inc. v. MangumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-01-14· cited 16×
- John W. Johnson, Inc., a Corporation v. 2500 Wisconsin Ave., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1956-02-16· cited 6×
- Ogunloye v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.District of Columbia· 1982-08-23· cited 4×
- Orange v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia· 1983-01-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.