Skip to main content
· 5/15/1876

Poincy v. Burke

Citations

  • 28 La. Ann. 673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a plan does not define the \proof\ or \documentation\ sufficient to establish disability, it was not unreasonable for MetLife to interpret the plan to require objective evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ludeling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.