Pohto v. Leiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disposing of federal trademark dilution claim based on evidence that “while [the mark] is a recognizable name among car manufacturers, fleet managers, and car rental companies, it is at this point less well-known among the general consuming public.” (alterations omitted)
• where marks in question were “at best weakly similar” under the Polaroid analysis, they were also “far from being so similar that any consumer [would] view them ‘as essentially the same’”
• striking an untimely expert declaration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).