Skip to main content
· 2/14/1950

Poff v. Richardson

Citations

  • 312 Ky. 237
  • 227 S.W.2d 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011) precluded consideration of new evidence, despite the petitioner’s attempt to present them to the Ohio courts in a successive post-conviction petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Helm, Tartar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.