Skip to main content
· 3/28/1990

Poeta v. Sheridan Point Shopping Plaza Partnership

Citations

  • 552 N.E.2d 1248
  • 195 Ill. App. 3d 852
  • 142 Ill. Dec. 507
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a benefit-of-the-bargain analysis for damages is appropriate in an action for fraud
  • holding that a benefit-of-the-bargain analysis for damages is appropriate in an action for fraud
  • holding that a benefit-of-the-bargain analysis for damages is appropriate in an action for fraud
  • “a ‘benefit-of-the-bargain’ analysis for damages is appropriate in an action for fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.