POE & BROWN OF GEORGIA, INC. v. Gill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating company would suffer irreparable harm due to former employee’s solicitation of customers because loss of customer results in injury that cannot be quantified
• equities “strongly weigh in favor” of injunctive relief where plaintiff presented evidence that defendant was unlawfully soliciting its customers
• equities “strongly weigh in favor” of injunctive relief where plaintiff presented evidence that defendant was unlawfully soliciting its customers
• trial court abused its discretion by failing to grant injunctive relief when plaintiff could suffer longstanding harm to its business as a result of defendant’s breach of a restrictive covenant
• “Injunctive relief has repeatedly been found appropriate in cases where covenants such as this have been found to be enforceable.” (quoting Rash v. Toccoa Clinic Med. Assocs., 320 S.E.2d 170, 174 (Ga. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).