Podgurski v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An administrator ... may not, as MetLife did here, cherry-pick the evidence it prefers while ignoring significant evidence to the contrary.”
• “An administrator may, in exercising its discretion, weigh competing evidence,1 but it may not ... cherry-pick the evidence it prefers while ignoring significant evidence to the contrary.”
• “First-hand observation is especially important in the context of assessing psychiatric disabilities.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).