· 5/10/2011
Poche v. JOUBRAN
Citations
- 644 F.3d 1105
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9498
- 2011 WL 1760178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although subsection (d)(4)’s language does not, by its terms, apply to sections (a) and (b), the statute as a whole makes the most sense when all of its provisions regarding ‘prevailing parties’ are read in the same way.”
- “Although subsection (d)(4)’s language does not, by its terms, apply to sections (a) and (b), the statute as a whole makes the most sense when all of its provisions regarding ‘prevailing parties’ are read in the same way.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Tacha, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.