Skip to main content
· 5/10/2011

Poche v. JOUBRAN

Citations

  • 644 F.3d 1105
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9498
  • 2011 WL 1760178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although subsection (d)(4)’s language does not, by its terms, apply to sections (a) and (b), the statute as a whole makes the most sense when all of its provisions regarding ‘prevailing parties’ are read in the same way.”
  • “Although subsection (d)(4)’s language does not, by its terms, apply to sections (a) and (b), the statute as a whole makes the most sense when all of its provisions regarding ‘prevailing parties’ are read in the same way.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Tacha, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.