Skip to main content
· 1/9/1933

Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.

Citations

  • 287 U.S. 518
  • 52 S. Ct. 262
  • 77 L. Ed. 469
  • 1933 U.S. LEXIS 982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statutes allowing for the recovery of preferential transfers were “quite in harmony” with the Code
  • \[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law...\
  • “[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law ...”
  • Wisconsin statute which regulated assignments and did not require that creditors seeking to participate agree to the debtor’s discharge held valid
  • “[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes 28 the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law . . .”
  • “[V]oluntary assignments, unless . . . put aside, should be regarded as not inconsistent with the purposes of the federal [Bankruptcy Act].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Butler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.