Supreme Court· 1/9/1933
Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.
Citations
- 287 U.S. 518
- 52 S. Ct. 262
- 77 L. Ed. 469
- 1933 U.S. LEXIS 982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that statutes allowing for the recovery of preferential transfers were “quite in harmony” with the Code
- \[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law...\
- “[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law ...”
- Wisconsin statute which regulated assignments and did not require that creditors seeking to participate agree to the debtor’s discharge held valid
- “[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes 28 the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law . . .”
- “[V]oluntary assignments, unless . . . put aside, should be regarded as not inconsistent with the purposes of the federal [Bankruptcy Act].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 158×
- Deitz v. FordNinth Circuit· 2014-07-28· cited 76×
- Deitz v. Ford (In Re Deitz)Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 64×
- Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-01-11· cited 43×
- City of New York and the Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1960-10-31· cited 24×
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSixth Circuit· 1935-02-11· cited 11×
- Johnston v. Telecheck Services, Inc. (In Re Johnston)N.D. West Virginia· 2007-03-02· cited 10×
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Wolf Furniture House, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-02· cited 9×
- Ropico, Inc. v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 1976-09-07· cited 6×
- In Re Newport Offshore Ltd.D. Rhode Island· 1998-02-09· cited 6×
- Credit Managers Ass'n v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-04· cited 6×
- SEAMAN PAPER CO. OF MASSACUHSETTS, INC. v. PolskyD. Massachusetts· 2007-11-20· cited 6×
- In Re Schwartz Bros.D. Minnesota· 1945-02-08· cited 5×
- Ready Fixtures Co. v. Stevens CabinetsW.D. Wisconsin· 2007-06-06· cited 5×
- Wisconsin Builders Supply Co. v. PrenticeSeventh Circuit· 1957-02-04· cited 4×
- In Re Colony Press, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1988-01-27· cited 4×
- Haberbush v. Charles & Dorothy Cummins Family Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-05-31· cited 4×
- In Re ThompsonE.D. Virginia· 1980-02-14· cited 3×
- In Re Wisconsin Builders Supply Co.E.D. Wisconsin· 1955-12-20· cited 3×
- Moskowitz v. PrenticeSeventh Circuit· 1956-11-27· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court· 1918-02-04· cited 330×
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court· 1931-04-20· cited 305×
- International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 222×
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court· 1899-05-22· cited 112×
- Boese v. KingSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 51×
- In re SieversE.D. Missouri· 1899-01-03· cited 35×
- Star v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1931-10-31· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.