Poblete v. Indymac Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he fact that Poblete I was dismissed as conceded pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) . . . is of no moment given that the purpose of claim preclusion is ‘[t]o preclude parties from contesting matters that they have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate.’ ”
• “The court or opposing party must be able to understand whether a valid claim is alleged and if so[,] what it is.”
• “[T]he D.C. Loan Shark Act explicitly exempts from its coverage loans greater than $25,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).