PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXVI Limited Partnership v. Carl Mabry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the fact that one party “refused to execute more formal documentation, does not, ipso facto, negate the trial court’s ruling that a valid and enforceable settlement was, nonetheless, reached in this case”
• declining to vacate a trial court’s order resolving a motion for lack of findings “in light of the clear language of Rule 52.01” providing that findings of fact and conclusions of law were not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).