PN Express, Inc. v. Zegel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where an employer’s liability is solely vicarious, the employer and employee “are regarded as a single tortfeasor”
• the apportionment statute does not apply where a defendant employer faces only vicarious liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior because the employer and employee “are regarded as a single tortfeasor”
• apportionment does not apply when a defendant’s liability is solely vicarious
• The apportionment statute, OCGA § 51-12-33 (b), \does not apply where a defendant employer faces only vicarious liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior because the employer and employee are regarded as a single tortfeasor.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).