PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court has always held responsible those who make fraudulent representation to another who “has in good faith relied thereon and been misled to his injury”
• holding that the Court has always held responsible those who make fraudulent representation to another who “has in good faith relied thereon and been misled to his injury.”
• noting that for equitable estoppel doctrines to apply, “reasonableness on the part of the party seeking the benefit of [its] application is expected.”
• while a fraudulent intent to deceive may give rise to an estoppel, a substantial inequity may arise justifying an estoppel without an original subjective intent to deceive
• while a fraudulent intent to deceive may give rise to an estoppel, a substantial inequity may arise justifying an estoppel without an original subjective intent to deceive
• “Without doubt, our statute of frauds provides that no contract for the conveyance of an interest in land is binding unless signed by the party to be charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).