PLYMOUTH FOAM PRODUCTS v. City of Becker, Minn.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the City could not be equitably estopped from asserting there was no contract because plaintiff was on notice officials had no authority to contract on behalf of city without approval and there was no evidence any city official advised plaintiff to the contrary
• holding the City could not be equitably estopped from asserting there was no -10- contract because plaintiff was on notice officials had no authority to contract on behalf of city without approval and there was no evidence any city official advised plaintiff to the contrary
• applying Minnesota law and holding no contract was ever formed between plaintiff and the city because the city's community development director had no authority to bind the city and plaintiff could not rely on his apparent authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).