Skip to main content
· 6/4/1902

Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Pennsylvania Wood Co.

Citations

  • 203 Pa. 206
  • 52 A. 245
  • 1902 Pa. LEXIS 686

Syllabus

<p>Arbitration — Referee's finding of fact — Terms oj parol contract.</p> <p>In an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered on a parol contract, where the evidence as to the terms of the contract is contradictory, a referee’s finding that the contract was “ that the defendant buying from the plaintiff twine in carload lots for current needs would be charged therefor the lowest current prices charged the plaintiff’s other customers, competitors of defendant, purchasing at the same time and in like amounts and under the same conditions,” will not be disturbed, where it appears that the finding is based upon sufficient evidence, and' has been confirmed by the court below.</p>

Judges: Bbown, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mestbezat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.