Skip to main content
· 1/3/2006

Plunkett v. Valhalla Investment Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 409 F. Supp. 2d 39
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1612
  • 2006 WL 137261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that personal jurisdiction defense was forfeited when party waited thirteen months between responsive pleading and asserting defense, and in the interim “1
  • finding that defendants abandoned personal jurisdiction defense by referencing it in their answer, then waiting thirteen months before litigating the defense
  • finding that defendants abandoned personal jurisdiction defense by referencing it in their answer, then waiting 13 months before litigating the defense
  • deeming personal jurisdiction defense abandoned where defendant participated in scheduling conference, conducted discovery, consented to ADR, entered into discovery-related stipulation and protective order, and petitioned for pro hae vice status for non-local counsel
  • deeming personal jurisdiction defense abandoned where defendant participated in scheduling conference, conducted discovery, consented to ADR, entered into discovery-related stipulation and protective order, and petitioned for pro hac vice status for non-local counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.