· 4/15/1884
Plummer v. Trost
Citations
- 81 Mo. 425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing a whistle-blower statute in New Hampshire that required written or verbal notice to the employer prior to disclosing the unlawful activity to a third party
- providing back pay allows the victim to come forward without fear of monetary punishment
- despite language of New Hampshire Whistle-blower’s Protection Act requiring employee to report suspected violation to the authorities, the employee is protected from discharge once he makes an internal complaint
- back pay is part of the injunctive remedy, rather than damages, because it seeks to make the aggrieved employee “whole”
- despite language of New Hamp shire Whistleblower’s Protection Act requiring employee to report suspected violation to the authorities, the employee is protected from discharge once he makes an internal complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Philips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.