Skip to main content
· 3/7/1887

Plummer v. Sargent

Citations

  • 120 U.S. 442
  • 7 S. Ct. 640
  • 30 L. Ed. 737
  • 1887 U.S. LEXIS 1989

Syllabus

<p>The reissued letters-patent No. 2355, dated September 11, 1866, granted to the Tucker->Manufacturing Company as assignee of Hiram Tucker, for an improved process of bronzing or coloring iron, and No. 2356, of like date and grantee for the product resulting'from that'process, are in fact for but one invention, and the new article of manufacture called Tu'cker bronze is a product which results from the use of the process described in the patent, and not one which may be produced in aiiy other way: and they are not infringed by.the manufacture, by the defendants, by the different process used by them) of an article which cannot be distinguished, by mere inspection, from Tucker bronze.</p>

Judges: Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.