Skip to main content
· 10/12/1988

Plummer v. Humana of Kansas, Inc.

Citations

  • 715 F. Supp. 302
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 285
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12247
  • 1988 WL 159136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding summary judgment appropriate where \[n]o issue of intent is presented because plaintiff shows the court no evidence which would indicate Humana intended to create an employment contract.\
  • holding summary judgment appropriate where “[n]o issue of intent is presented because plaintiff shows the court no evidence which would indicate Humana intended to create an employment contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.