Plumeau v. School District #40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \public school children have a constitutionally protected [due process] right not to be sexually abused by school employees at school\
• explaining that dismissal with prejudice is 25 appropriate where further amendment would be futile
• “A plaintiff has a duty to use due diligence in an effort to discover the party responsible for her injury.”
• “[T]he Constitution protects a child’s right to be free from sexual abuse by school employees while attending public school.”
• public school students have a substantive due process right not to be sexually abused by school employees at school
• “[Plaintiff] had a constitutional right to be free 15 from state-imposed violations of bodily integrity. . . . This includes freedom from excessive 16 physical abuse by school employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).