Skip to main content
· 3/17/2010

Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 773 Pension Fund v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

Citations

  • 694 F. Supp. 2d 287
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25041
  • 2010 WL 961596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “knowledge of a general economic trend does not equate to harboring a mental state to deceive, manipulate, or defraud”
  • dismissing claim that defendant “should 28 have recorded much larger write-downs earlier than it 29 did”
  • “Courts in this Circuit have long held that accusations founded on nothing more than a defendant’s corporate position are entitled to no weight.”
  • “Plaintiffs should, but do not, provide specific instances in which Defendants received information that was contrary to their public declarations.”
  • plaintiff “must specifically identify the reports or statements that are contradictory to the statements made” (emphasis in original, internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “broad references to raw data” insufficient to establish that defendants should have known particular information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William H. Pauley III

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.