Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund v. M & P Master Plumbers of Michigan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the employer’s “statements in his affidavit, regarding the nature of the work for each of the individual workers, without more are insufficient to establish an issue of material fact”
• holding that the employer failed to meet its burden when its affidavit “regarding the nature of the work for each of the individual workers” was conclusory and “insufficient to establish an issue of material fact”
• “[Defendant Panknin] also admitted that he had the final say in all decisions regarding M&P, including whether fringe benefit contributions were to be paid.”
• “[Defendant Panknin] also admitted that he had the final say in all decisions regarding M & P, including whether fringe benefit contributions were to be paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).