Plumb Rite Plumbing Service v. Barbour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimant's injury was not compensable because he was merely \bending over\ to pick up a piece of pipe when his injury occurred, and there was no - 5 - significant work-related risk or exertion
• requiring either a “work related risk or significant work related exertion” (emphasis added)
• “The mere happening of an accident at the workplace, not caused by any work related risk or significant work related exertion, is not compensable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).