Skip to main content
· 1/25/1999

Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of Conway

Citations

  • 512 S.E.2d 106
  • 334 S.C. 30
  • 1999 S.C. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a writ of mandamus is a coercive writ that orders a public official to perform a ministerial duty
  • noting that the subject matter is the same “when the claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence that was the subject of a prior action.”
  • noting that the fact that different remedies were sought in a subsequent action did not alter the fact that the claims from both actions arose from the same exact factual basis and were identical
  • barring a litigant from raising issues which might have been raised in a former suit
  • finding primary purpose of mandamus is to enforce an established legal right and corresponding imperative duty imposed by law
  • finding primary purpose of mandamus is to enforce an established legal right and corresponding imperative duty imposed by law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.