Plowman v. Pratt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant and concluding that “[n] or mal canine behavior, such as a dog barking at a stranger, is not sufficient to infer that a [defendant] has actual knowledge of a dog’s dangerous propensities”
• a dog’s barking is “[n]ormal canine behavior,” and it is unreasonable to attribute vicious propensities to a dog merely because it barks at strangers
• “Normal canine behavior, such as a dog barking at a stranger, is not sufficient to infer that a landlord has actual knowledge of a dog’s dangerous propensities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).