Plotkin v. IP Axess, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• utilizing Federal Court Management Statistics to evaluate the congestion of each court’s docket and prospect for earlier disposition and trial
• utilizing Federal Court Management Statistics to evaluate the congestion of each court’s docket and prospect for earlier disposition and trial
• finding “the significance of defendants’ witnesses weighs in favor of a transfer,” and plaintiffs’ witnesses “will testify merely to the fact that plaintiffs purchased the Company’s securities”
• discounting plaintiff’s choice of forum where, among other things, the allegedly misleading statements “were generated at the [defendant’s] headquarters in Texas” and “[a]lthough some of the stock was purchased in Illinois, the purchase of the stock is not at issue here”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Body Science LLC v. Boston Scientific Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-03-06· cited 33×
• Forcillo v. LeMond Fitness, Inc.
  S.D. Illinois· 2004-04-09· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-07-14· cited 482×
• Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. Igoe
  Seventh Circuit· 1955-02-16· cited 169×
• Vandeveld v. Christoph
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-02-27· cited 66×
• Amoco Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-03-22· cited 35×
• Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Sims
  N.D. Illinois· 1994-12-12· cited 31×
• Brandon Apparel Group, Inc. v. Quitman Manufacturing Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 1999-03-18· cited 31×
• Bryant v. ITT Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 1999-05-12· cited 16×